At 1234753836 time_t, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > I agree with, you are reaching something very good.
Well, I'm open to inclusion of such module FWIW. When you think it's ready for inclusion do not hesitate to ask for a review here. What's needed in your case is just a branch of awesome with your work as a patch on top of it so I can easily merge it. I don't really have time to do a first review right now, but at first sight the only thing I'd say is to add at least: * standard headers at the beginning of each module * code comments (where needed) * proper luadoc at the beginning of functions * make function local if needed (do not expert everything if it's not needed) Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <[email protected]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // This is the end of my signature.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
