+1 for relase But why Axis2 0.9652? I would prefer 0.94 ..lets keep it logical and simple. I do not see any need to do something fancy.
The relase number are to give a understanding about the nature of the relase .. lets keep it that way Thanks Srinath But why On 12/28/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me. Next week sounds good. > > On 12/27/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, > > > > After our last release on 2nd of December, I think we did enough work > > to do the next release. We have improved some features during the > > hackathon and after that also we improved Axis2. And there were number > > of major fixes we did after 0.93. > > So how abt having another release, preferrably before next year, or > > first week of January, the latest. > > Please let me know your working schedule with Axis2. Do you want some > > more time to complete the things you are working on ? And please let > > me know the things that are completed so far as well. > > > > And how abt naming the next release as Axis2 0.9652, rather than 0.94 > > ? This is a funny number came up by Glen or Sanjiva during ApacheCon. > > > > What do you all think ? > > > > 1. Please let me know whether you like to have a release ? > > 2. If yes, please propose a date > > 3. Let me know the features or fixes you have done so far by filling > > the wiki : http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis2/releases/0.94 > > > > Thanks, > > Chinthaka > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) > > > > iD8DBQFDsVUJjON2uBzUhh8RAsWXAKCONLCrU/36ngRFXMs3Ic57s5u/VQCgq14u > > lGx94eHmezcQ33L9otcqz5w= > > =sBz0 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >
