Rob: You are raising questions about the meaning of certain names in the Hebrew Bible. I hope the moderators may allow us to discuss the meaning of those names. 1. If PRZ-Y is a west Semitic word, then it might mean, as you say, “ belonging to a village” “rural”. “rustics”….” But no such tribal name is attested historically. At the website noted below, Richard Hess, the leading expert in analyzing Amarna personal names, sees the match of PRZ-Y to the Hurrian name “Pirizzi” as meaning “Hurrian” in a mid-14th century BCE context: “While the Perizzites could be ‘village dwellers’, the fact that a similarly named Pirizzi comes from the N. Syrian kingdom of Mitanni in the Amarna letters invites comparison with…the presence of Hurrians and other northerners in the region….. ” Richard S. Hess, “Peoples in Early Israel”, at _http://www.bibleinterp.com/opeds/people358009.shtml_ (http://www.bibleinterp.com/opeds/people358009.shtml) , November, 2010 2. If PRZ-Y is viewed as having a singular meaning at Genesis 13: 7, then as opposed to “the Canaanite”, namely Lab’ayu, the notorious Canaanite strongman ruler north of Bethel at Shechem, also referenced is IR-Heba, the Hurrian princeling ruler of Jerusalem, south of Bethel, who in a series of Amarna Letters rants and rails to no end against tent dwellers/Apiru. We know from the Amarna Letters that these two rulers were high profile in Years 12-13, as “Year 12” is the Egyptian docket date on Lab’ayu’s Amarna Letter EA 254, and Lab’ayu is assassinated prior to the end of Year 13. Genesis 14: 5 refers to “Year 14” as the timing of the events that unfold in that chapter, but also briefly refers to “Year 13” at Genesis 14: 4. Thus Genesis 13: 7 would be referring to a period shortly before Year 14, namely Year 13, which fits in perfectly with the dating of the above Amarna Letter from the strongman Canaanite ruler of Shechem.
3. You wrote: “And why would Abraham seek an east west route to escape the Perizzites when according to the Septuagint Perizzites lived at Shechem (Gen 34:30)….?” (a) At Genesis 34: 30, PRZ-Y is referring to the Hurrians in the plural at Shechem. Historically, we know that there was a strong Hurrian presence at Shechem. Claire M. Epstein, “Palestinian Bichrome Ware” (1966), at p. 165. Moreover, Late Bronze Age Shechem prominently featured a Hurrian-style migdal temple. (b) When Lot and Abram go “east” and the opposite of east at Genesis 13: 9, they thereby neatly exit hill country (which runs north and south), and as such avoid both of the two most notorious princelings in the entirety of the Amarna Letters: Lab’ayu, who was at the time operating out of Shechem (though he was not the official mayor of Shechem), and IR-Heba, the Hurrian princeling ruler of Jerusalem who was officially blessed by Akhenaten as mayor of Jerusalem. (c) By going the opposite of “east” from Bethel, Abram comes to the northeast Ayalon Valley, west of Bethel, which was ruled by a tent-dweller friendly Amorite princeling, both at Genesis 14: 13 and in the Amarna Letters. “ Mamre” is an apt Biblical nickname for historical Milk-Ilu. Note how all three of the most famous princeling rulers in the Amarna Letters as of Year 13 -- Lab’ayu, IR-Heba and Milk-Ilu, a Canaanite strongman at Shechem, a Hurrian princeling ruler at Jerusalem, and an Amorite princerling ruler at Gezer in the Ayalon Valley -- are referenced with specificity in chapters 13-14 of Genesis. 4. The p-i-n-p-o-i-n-t historical accuracy of the Patriarchal narratives in describing the precise situation that obtained in the southern half of Canaan early in Year 13 is absolutely breathtaking. We not only have all three short-lived prominent rulers in the southern half of Canaan referenced each with his exact ethnicity and locality, but also Genesis 14: 4 even gives us the e-x-a-c-t year: Year 13. And note how wise Abram is to give Lab’ ayu’s Shechem and IR-Heba’s Jerusalem a wide berth, and instead sojourn where Abram could enter into a beneficial covenant with the princeling ruler there: the Ayalon Valley of Milk-Ilu. The two keys to the above approach are (i) to view both H-KN‘NY and H-PRZY as having a singular meaning at Genesis 13: 7, and (ii) to view PRZY as being a Hurrian-based reference to the Hurrians. Jim Stinehart Evanston, Illinois _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
