On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Jonathan Mohler <[email protected] > wrote:
> Dave: > > [snip] > This part of the argument baffles me. The fact that the extant NT mss all > have KS says nothing about the first century. They just speak to the fact > that in the second century Scribes put KS for God's name. That's all. > There is no more evidence in these mss for KYRIOS than for YHWH or IAO. > And it doesn't matter if there is one MS or 5000 MSS. Until we find MSS > from the first century with KYRIOS, we cannot speak of the newer documents > as evidence. The scant evidence (OT Greek mss BCE) that Rolf has presented > speaks more to the issue than the silence of the first century autographs. > The argument may be weak, but as an inductive argument, it is cogent. > I have already addressed Rolf's "evidence," and he has not responded. Others have also addressed it and he has not responded. As for first-century mss, it's clear that you do not understand how textual criticism works, but that topic is beyond the purview of this list. -- Dave Washburn Check out my Internet show: http://www.irvingszoo.com Now available: a novel about King Josiah!
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
