On 26/02/07, vijay chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26/02/07, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/02/07, vijay chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26/02/07, Jason Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, however if you are using other people's server juice and
bandwidth
> > > then you should pay for it on their terms. Not a big ask. If the
banner
> > > or whatever payment terms they have annoys you, then don't go back.
> >
> > If you don't want me to look at your site, on my terms, don't put it on
a
> > public network; otherwise I'll do what I like with what you serve me,
> > including not taking content (aka adverts)on my PC
>
> Perhaps you'd care to publish a list of the IP addresses you're likely
> to use a web site from, in order that the owners can comply with your
> requirements, then. I'd be glad too, for one.
>
> --
> Peter Bowyer
What's that supposed to mean? You're either publishing your content (in
whatever format) on a public network or not.
I completely disagree. The ToU of my website could preclude its use in
the way you're proposing. I can take proportionate steps to enforce my
ToU - which in this case could include preventing your proposed use.
Peter
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
