I was testing in firefox, latest version on win xp. Also tested with IE6
and Opera 8 which work fine (IE 5.5 and less won't load at all). My old
copy of Opera 9 Beta does not work with the keys, perhaps this extends
to the non beta version too. In Ubuntu with firefox zoom appears to work
using + and -, arrow keys only scroll after selection, and this possibly
varies on different systems? IE7 requires you to select the map first,
as the text box has focus by default, so i guess if its not tabable
you'd have to use mousekeys for kb only access.
I don't have a mac of any kind to test that end, so i'll have to assume
the support for it is just poor.
~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:
Jason & Stephen,
when javascript is disabled in Opera or Camino the message is:
Your web browser is not fully supported by Google Maps
I wonder is the code IE7 specific?
none of the keys work for me on os x
unless I'm missing something this hardly qualifies as accessible...
regards
Jonathan Chetwynd
On 15 May 2007, at 16:57, Jason Cartwright wrote:
Disable javascript. Everything works fine.
J
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of "~:'' ????????????"
Sent: 15 May 2007 16:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [backstage] Web 2.0 'neglecting good Accessible design'
Richard,
how does one use http://maps.google.com/ via the keyboard?
cheers
Jonathan Chetwynd
On 15 May 2007, at 13:22, Richard Lockwood wrote:
This particular rant seems to be about useability rather than
accessibility (although I appreciate the two are often closely
related). Much as I often loathe Nielsen's writing - Jason's right,
it's often all about Nielsen more than it is about any actual problems
- in this case he's got a point. "Web 2.0" sites are often completely
unuseable - MySpace being a prime example, and Flickr (although it's
been a while since I tried to use it to post a few pics and it may
well have improved) another.
Google Maps however, I'd hold up as a prime example of excellent
intuitive design and useability.
Just as the phrase "Web 2.0" means different things to all people (I
avoid it if at all possible as I feel it just makes the user sound
like a buzzword spouting bandwagon-jumper who hasn't a clue what he's
actually saying ;-) ), you can't tar all "Web 2.0" sites with the
same brush.
Anyway, I've banged on far too long now, and this is what Nielsen
wants - people to discuss HIM HIM HIM!!! Frankly, the less I hear of
and from this tedious old bore, the happier I am.
Cheers,
Rich.
On 5/15/07, "~:'' ありがとうございました。"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason & Gordon
any good Accessible Web 2.0 websites you'd care to plug?
or are you in a rush?
cheers
Jonathan Chetwynd
On 15 May 2007, at 10:18, Jason Cartwright wrote:
This is all my personal opinion, and I entirely disagree.
Mr Nielsen has a history of spouting contrary opinions to court
controversy and gain publicity for himself and his company.
"Web 2.0"[1] (for me at least) incorporates best practice
methodologies of developing to standards (and the consequences of
this, such as progressive enhancement etc) and "trusting users as co-
developers" [2].
These core principals of "Web 2.0" encourage good design.
As with any technology, "Web 2.0" will be misused - it's not the
technology's fault that this happens, it's the designer/developer that
fouled it up's problem. That doesn't look as good when you're goading
mainstream journos into writing about you though, does it?
J
[1] I've stuck all these in quotes, as I think "Web 2.0" means
different things to different people.
[2] Tim O'Reilly
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ‾:''
????????????
Sent: 15 May 2007 08:48
To: [email protected]
Subject: [backstage] Jakob Nielsen: Web 2.0 'neglecting good design'
Jakob Nielsen: Web 2.0 'neglecting good design'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6653119.stm
seems to have copied my pitch for hackday ‾:"
has he been invited?
was I?
did anyone else have ideas or requirements for an accessible SVG front
end?
cheers
Jonathan Chetwynd
Accessibility Consultant on Learning Disabilities and the Internet
http://www.eas-i.co.uk
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/
mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/[email protected]/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/
mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/[email protected]/
--
SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073
Registered address:
4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/
mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/[email protected]/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
