Mo McRoberts wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 15:07, Alia Sheikh <alia.she...@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
"However, don't get me wrong - it would be nice if there were more
flexibility regarding the portability of protected content, but instead of
many very smart people expending huge amounts of effort demonising DRM,
maybe it would be better spent constructively, on finding a solution that
will help protect investments and be "Free" software friendly?"
Sounds good in all seriousness, would be interested to take part in *that*
discussion.
Unfortunately, that discussion isn’t really one which is at all
technical in nature—it’s broadly a matter of legal and business
strategy. Not quite so interesting to the kinds of smart people who
tend to have an interest in the technical stuff! There’s some
cross-over, though… ;)
It is an interesting issue.
Also known as "why everything you know about copyright is wrong !"
It needs a new thread and perhaps a new day, but please start without
me, (I won't be able to resist commenting) You may find my views radical
as my suggested title implies.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
