I'd be interested in your thoughts on these comments about prophecy from a Baha'i academic. He made an interesting point about the calcuation of the years which I hadn't noticed, and can't say I would be able to respond to. Here were his comments:

I tend to take prophecy stuff with a grain of salt. If the Baha'i Writings say X is fulfilled, fine. But if you want to "refute" them, sometimes they're pretty easy. Consider how one comes up with 1844 being 1260; you have to assume 1260 refers to months of 30 days and years of 360 days in order to convert "42 months" and "three and a half times" into 1260, and then once you get 1260 years you have to assume it refers to a years of 354 days instead of 360 or 365.24 days. If 'Abdu'l-Baha hadn't said that's the way it is, I would have said it's absurd.

_________________________________________________________________
Surf the net and talk on the phone with Xtra Jetstream @ http://www.xtra.co.nz/products/0,,5803,00.html !



__________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web - http://list.jccc.net/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.net/bahai-st http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist (public) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (public)



Reply via email to