I'd say very painfull. for example, the Canvas is very nice for applets, but with 2Mb almost no one is going to use it that way...perhaps a small distribution would make sense...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 15:44
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

You don't need all the jar files, it would be possible (although a little painful) to also strip down the jars just to those classes that you actually use.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:59 AM
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

regarding this, I noted that the full batik jars are 2Mb, so perhaps that's a problem for pocket. is there any way to reduce the size of the batik distro ?
 
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Gale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 14:37
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

Could you specify the core modules you are interested in using?
 
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Nuno Faria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Batik Users
Subject: Batik and jdk1.1

Hi ppl,
 
Can use the batik core modules and low level modules with jdk1.1?
My purpose is to create a SVG Viewer for Pocket PCs and i only know the Jeode Java virtual machine for Pocket PC and it only suports (i guess!) jdk1.1.
I appreciate all the help u can give to me namely if there is any newer VM for pocket...
Thanks,
 
Nuno Andr� Faria
SIG Lab, DI
Universidade do Minho
Braga, Portugal

Reply via email to