Re: Batik and jdk1.1 (to Anthony)

[Nuno Faria]

So, you are saying to me that is no away to run the batik modules in pocket pc? (look i'm not interested in run the SVGCanvas i can make another canvas without swing if it's possible!!)   Nuno Andr� Faria SIG Lab, DI Universidade do Minho Braga, Portugal ----- Original Message ----- From: Jon Burgin To: 'Batik Users' Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:17 PM Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1 Sure, but the problem is that no one could know correctly guess everyone's needs apriori.  I know that IBM's MicroAge tool for developing on palm for power pc, automatically will create a jar with just those classes that you reference.  I think they have support for pocketpc too, but they don't really support swing.  If you want to do swing on PPC, you need Personal Java and you have to modify it. I'll try to remember and get a link from home regarding this. But here is another problem, you think these jars,are big?  Wait until you look at Swing, which the JSVGCanvas depends on!  Not to mention that the StrongArm is no where near as powerful as your desktop cpu.   Well anyhow, email me if you want me to find that reference for you, and good luck with you project.   :) -----Original Message----- From: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:57 AM To: 'Batik Users' Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1 I'd say very painfull. for example, the Canvas is very nice for applets, but with 2Mb almost no one is going to use it that way...perhaps a small distribution would make sense... -----Original Message----- From: Jon Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 15:44 To: 'Batik Users' Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1 You don't need all the jar files, it would be possible (although a little painful) to also strip down the jars just to those classes that you actually use. -----Original Message----- From: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:59 AM To: 'Batik Users' Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1 regarding this, I noted that the full batik jars are 2Mb, so perhaps that's a problem for pocket. is there any way to reduce the size of the batik distro ?   thanks -----Original Message----- From: Michael Gale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 14:37 To: 'Batik Users' Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1 Could you specify the core modules you are interested in using?   Mike -----Original Message----- From: Nuno Faria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:00 AM To: Batik Users Subject: Batik and jdk1.1 Hi ppl,   Can use the batik core modules and low level modules with jdk1.1? My purpose is to create a SVG Viewer for Pocket PCs and i only know the Jeode Java virtual machine for Pocket PC and it only suports (i guess!) jdk1.1. I appreciate all the help u can give to me namely if there is any newer VM for pocket... Thanks,   Nuno Andr� Faria SIG Lab, DI Universidade do Minho Braga, Portugal