Title: Message
Yes, there are some classes, but they are missing some.  Look for java.awt.geom or java.awt.color.  According to the Personal Java spec, they are missing.  If you can find these packages, then you can probably port it.  I would be happy to help with a port, if it is possible without rewriting Batik.
 
Anthony
-----Original Message-----
From: Nuno Faria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Batik Users
Subject: Re: Batik and jdk1.1 (to Anthony)

But when i install Jeode VM it comes with some java.awt and java2D classes. Are them incomplete? I just can not display any Java2D interface in Pocket PC?
 
Nuno Andr� Faria
SIG Lab, DI
Universidade do Minho
Braga, Portugal
----- Original Message -----
From: Tangent
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1 (to Anthony)

Just wondering if there is anyway to write wrapper classes for all the drawing instructions of Batik, so we can easily port it to other platforms or languages such as .NET in C# using GDI+
 
- Tangent
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Batik Users
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1 (to Anthony)

AFAIK, you can not run Batik on the Pocket PC.  SVGCanvas is not the problem and swing is not the problem.  The problem is that Batik uses Java2D, and I know of no implementation that will run on Pocket PC.  You would have to implement hundreds of classes like Rectangle2D, Line2D, etc...  You can maybe get Batik to read SVG, but it will not be able to display the image.  You may ask the developers if the rendering code is easy to rewrite, but I don't think so.  It is the gvt (if I remember correctly) classes that will cause the most problems.  BTW, even if you don't draw to the display, you still need Java2D internally.
 
The only options I know that will work on a handheld is to replace Pocket PC.
 
Anthony
 
-----Original Message-----
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Nuno Faria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Batik Users
Subject: Re: Batik and jdk1.1 (to Anthony)

So, you are saying to me that is no away to run the batik modules in pocket pc?
(look i'm not interested in run the SVGCanvas i can make another canvas without swing if it's possible!!)
 
Nuno Andr� Faria
SIG Lab, DI
Universidade do Minho
Braga, Portugal
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Burgin
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:17 PM
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

Sure, but the problem is that no one could know correctly guess everyone's needs apriori.  I know that IBM's MicroAge tool for developing on palm for power pc, automatically will create a jar with just those classes that you reference.  I think they have support for pocketpc too, but they don't really support swing.  If you want to do swing on PPC, you need Personal Java and you have to modify it. I'll try to remember and get a link from home regarding this. But here is another problem, you think these jars,are big?  Wait until you look at Swing, which the JSVGCanvas depends on!  Not to mention that the StrongArm is no where near as powerful as your desktop cpu.
 
Well anyhow, email me if you want me to find that reference for you, and good luck with you project.   :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:57 AM
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

I'd say very painfull. for example, the Canvas is very nice for applets, but with 2Mb almost no one is going to use it that way...perhaps a small distribution would make sense...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 15:44
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

You don't need all the jar files, it would be possible (although a little painful) to also strip down the jars just to those classes that you actually use.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Trindade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:59 AM
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

regarding this, I noted that the full batik jars are 2Mb, so perhaps that's a problem for pocket. is there any way to reduce the size of the batik distro ?
 
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Gale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Abril de 2002 14:37
To: 'Batik Users'
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1

Could you specify the core modules you are interested in using?
 
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Nuno Faria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Batik Users
Subject: Batik and jdk1.1

Hi ppl,
 
Can use the batik core modules and low level modules with jdk1.1?
My purpose is to create a SVG Viewer for Pocket PCs and i only know the Jeode Java virtual machine for Pocket PC and it only suports (i guess!) jdk1.1.
I appreciate all the help u can give to me namely if there is any newer VM for pocket...
Thanks,
 
Nuno Andr� Faria
SIG Lab, DI
Universidade do Minho
Braga, Portugal

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature

Reply via email to