|
AFAIK, you can not run Batik on the Pocket PC. SVGCanvas is
not the problem and swing is not the problem. The problem is that Batik
uses Java2D, and I know of no implementation that will run on Pocket
PC. You would have to implement hundreds of classes like
Rectangle2D, Line2D, etc... You can maybe get Batik to read SVG, but it
will not be able to display the image. You may ask the developers if the
rendering code is easy to rewrite, but I don't think so. It is
the gvt (if I remember correctly) classes that will cause the most
problems. BTW, even if you don't draw to the display, you still need
Java2D internally.
The
only options I know that will work on a handheld is to replace Pocket
PC.
Anthony
So, you are saying to me that is no away to run
the batik modules in pocket pc?
(look i'm not interested in run the SVGCanvas i
can make another canvas without swing if it's possible!!)
Nuno Andr� Faria
SIG Lab, DI
Universidade do Minho
Braga,
Portugal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:17
PM
Subject: RE: Batik and jdk1.1
Sure, but the problem is that no one could know correctly guess
everyone's needs apriori. I know that IBM's MicroAge tool for
developing on palm for power pc, automatically will create a jar with just
those classes that you reference. I think they have support for
pocketpc too, but they don't really support swing. If you want to do
swing on PPC, you need Personal Java and you have to modify it. I'll try to
remember and get a link from home regarding this. But here is another
problem, you think these jars,are big? Wait until you look at Swing,
which the JSVGCanvas depends on! Not to mention that the StrongArm is
no where near as powerful as your desktop cpu.
Well anyhow, email me if you want me to find that reference for
you, and good luck with you project. :)
I'd say very painfull. for example, the Canvas is
very nice for applets, but with 2Mb almost no one is going to use it that
way...perhaps a small distribution would make sense...
You don't need all the jar files, it would be possible (although
a little painful) to also strip down the jars just to those classes that
you actually use.
regarding this, I noted that the full batik
jars are 2Mb, so perhaps that's a problem for pocket. is there any way
to reduce the size of the batik distro ?
thanks
Could
you specify the core modules you are interested in
using?
Mike
Hi ppl,
Can use the batik core modules and
low level modules with jdk1.1?
My purpose is to create a
SVG Viewer for Pocket PCs and i only know the Jeode Java
virtual machine for Pocket PC and it only suports (i guess!)
jdk1.1.
I appreciate all the help u can give
to me namely if there is any newer VM for pocket...
Thanks,
Nuno Andr� Faria
SIG Lab,
DI
Universidade do Minho
Braga,
Portugal
|
smime.p7s