Let me respond below..

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 1:42 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mike Mohr wrote:
>>
>> Please don't misunderstand the following comments.
>
> English _is_ my second language but I will do my best to not misunderstand
> the following comments.  I hope you do the same.

aye, will do.

>>
>> I am not
>> disparaging the great work done by the bcm43xx team, but the fact is
>> that a reverse engineered driver will never be as good as a driver for
>> which the original source code or specs are released by the
>> manufacturer.
>
> That is not a fact.  That's an unproven assertion.

this is a fact as opposed to an assertion, at least in general.  When
the OEM releases information about how a specific piece of hardware
works, that information will be more accurate than clean-room
reverse-engineered specifications in almost every situation.  It may
just be a subtle difference, but that may make or break the
performance.  YMMV.

>>
>> As a result,
>> support for their chips in Linux is just superb;
>
> Whatever subjective phrase "support...is...just superb" there's no such
> causality.  That means, to use smaller words, that there's no indication
> that the "superb support" is BECAUSE they released open-source drivers.  I'm
> sure that is a factor, but it's not a CAUSE.

Again I'd disagree.  The good folks over at rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
have spent a vast amount of time cleaning up the Ralink drivers for
inclusion in the vanilla kernel.  Without the vendor support it is
almost certain that there would be no F/OSS driver available for this
hardware.  Thus the excellent open-source hardware support for their
cards is a direct result (aka a "cause") of their source code
releases.

>>
>> If you want a card that will work
>> perfectly in all situations, go with a card that has a Ralink chipset.
>>
>
> If I wanted a commercial or spam I'd join another list.

I don't view my comments as commercials or spam.  Notice that I
carefully avoided mentioning any specific manufacturer or device by
name.  Ralink only produces the chipsets; the consumer cards that
contains these chips are manufactured by e.g. Hawking Technologies.
Nowhere in my original mail did I mention a device vendor by name.

>
> Ehud
>
>

Mike

P.S. MB -- thanks for your support :)
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to