Dear Lloyd, Just a quick note on the results of the BD trial at Dalgetty. A short while ago Roger commented how the BD trial area had improved since 20mm of rain. He informed me today that due to the fires that are still sweeping down around Jindabyne they are opening up the TSR to 300 head of cattle for a month. Not bad for 100 acres or so that had previously been condemmed as some of the poorest soil on the Monaro. That is before we even start to use Radionics. It has only had BD preps and compost teas on it to date. Will keep you informed what is happening on the TSR. Roger is going to do a photo shoot within the next couple of days to add to the pictorial record of the trials. There is going to be an International Rangeland Conference at Cooma at the end of this year where there is a possibility of doing a presentation on the BD trial at this conference. However this is just a distant dream of two crazy characters who love to play around seeing what happens if we do this, or if we do that. We dont have any BD theory to defend, and it may be that by the time we are finished that some of the given facts of BD theory may have to be looked at again. Particularly on the use of BD 501. Go well. James Hedley.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lloyd Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 6:08 PM Subject: Re: Radionics and scientists > Allan wrote> > > I noticed over and over again that as I asked Mr. York or > > Mr. Brinton about the effectiveness of one dynamic approach to > > another - - from Heinz Groetzke's 100% chicken manure tea to radionic > > application, each of them in their own way and own words asked 'Why > > would a person need that? There must be something fairly basic that > > is not right or you wouldn't be looking for something so extreme.' > I agree wholeheartedly with getting the basics right first - but cant agree > that radionics (or homeopathic use of BDpreps ) is extreme - opposite I > would have thought - very subtle ! . I reckon using big licks of compost is > extreme, accepting as normal, a quarter or less of commercial yields is > extreme, growing plants under more or less continuous moisture stress to > induce mineralised fruit is extreme, bombing a vineyard on a regular basis > with elemental sulphur seems extreme, using radionics to remove the need for > some of these tactics would seem to be pretty worthwhile to me. > While I dont agree with the use of radionics to flog a particular brand of > product I do agree with Gil that we should take notice of the results gained > by professional practicioners after all does Alan York consult for free? > Does Brinton do lab testing for free so as to remain unbiased ? I still > think too that once someone (anyone) decides that radionics (or anything > else) has no place in the system they become quite blind to anything but the > most blatantly obvious result. When I posted on brix and frost a few weeks > back Elaine Ingham just could not accept the possibility that I may have > been right in saying that high brix in the crop sap rendered that crop less > prone to frosting - no it was the microbes pure and simple, the critters did > it by generating warmth!!, OK I maybe do have the microbes going better than > the guy down the road, but I sure as hell know I had brix going way way > better, It wouldnt have cost much to consider the possibility. I think these > two guys above are a tad biased in their outlook and approach to radionics > and (probably) homeopathic preps. These days when I hear "prove it" . I just > say "nah! you go look for your self". If the person has an open mind and > there's something there they'll see it - if they're open to the possibility > and cant see they'll ask to be shown, if they're not open no amount of > 'proving' will make the difference!! > Cheers all > Lloyd Charles > > > > >
