-----------------------------------------------------------

New Message on BDOTNET

-----------------------------------------------------------
From: DotNetSaavy (Mr.BabuRaj)
Message 5 in Discussion

Sachin, This is what I've done, but the feedback I got was that that the table can 
grow exponentially on a later date, where we will end up with redundant entries for 
UserId in the Preferences table.For production server is it advisable to have this 
kind of a design.Please advise. I have a junction table as below where I'm currently 
storing the user preferences    Table Name :- User Preferences UserId         
PropertyId        Priority Order ******       ********         *****
Ind1            1                  500 
Ind1            2                  33
Ind1            3                  92
Ind1            4                  101 -                  -                    - -     
             -                    - -                  -                    - Ind1     
       600               24   don't you think user id column has redundant (repeating) 
values of userid, in this case we will end up having 100*600 = 60K entries in the 
table.If there is no other work around then I'm ready to stick to this approach.Do you 
have any comments on NetPointer's approach above   Thanks BabuRaj  

-----------------------------------------------------------

To stop getting this e-mail, or change how often it arrives, go to your E-mail 
Settings.
http://groups.msn.com/BDotNet/_emailsettings.msnw

Need help? If you've forgotten your password, please go to Passport Member Services.
http://groups.msn.com/_passportredir.msnw?ppmprop=help

For other questions or feedback, go to our Contact Us page.
http://groups.msn.com/contact

If you do not want to receive future e-mail from this MSN group, or if you received 
this message by mistake, please click the "Remove" link below. On the pre-addressed 
e-mail message that opens, simply click "Send". Your e-mail address will be deleted 
from this group's mailing list.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to