Yes, I would think symbols would need to be included to break on functions,
but I believe the video I watched (TI board port series modules 6,7)
specified to load the bin file after switching CCS into debug mode.. When I
get a native linux machine setup, I'll be able to report back. Going to try
that tomorrow, but then there's that corporate network thing...
On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 4:22:24 PM UTC-5, lazarman wrote:
> Don't you want to load the output generated with debug info not the .bin?
> I've used a lauterbach emulator to load uboot for source level debugging.
> You need to point to source tree where you built uboot. If I recall
> correctly we used a dual boot Ubuntu machine at work. We built in Ubuntu
> and used CCS in windows and had a mount to a shared partition. At that time
> uboot debugging was possible in linux but I believe we had the linux
> drivers for the jtag from either TI or Lauterbach. I think using a virtual
> machine your gonna have issues
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Jeff Andich
> We're not yet able to setup Ubuntu native on PC's at work, so we're using
> Ubuntu under VBOX.
> I'm attempting to do JTAG debugging via CCS 7.2 to the BB-X15/am572xEVM,
> but when I run CCS in debug mode under an Ubuntu/VirtualBox, CCS hangs.
> I'm able to view registers on the A15_0 core, but I haven't been able to
> successfully load u-boot-spl.bin built in CCS on Ubuntu. When I load, CCS
> never comes back, and I haven't been able to specify the "load address" for
> the SPL. From what I understand from reading an older version of TI's CCS
> wiki, JTAG debugging doesn't work well through a virtual machine.
> So I'm trying a strange approach: 2, CCS 7.2 installations on the same
> machine, 1 under the Ubuntu VM to build the SPL in Linux and another under
> Windows to manage the JTAG debugging process (e.g. load u-boot-spl.bin via
> JTAG, view memory, step, etc). But I'm having some issues using a
> Windows/VBOX shared folder to contain the u-boot tree so that both the
> Windows and Ubuntu CCS's can look at the same tree/project.
> Has anyone on this forum successfully tried this kind of thing before or
> are there obvious reasons why this is a bad idea??
> I think the person in the following thread may have tried something like
> I may post up on TI/E2E, but we're working with the BB-X15 image, not the
> TI SDK image. I'll try to annotate this thread with any useful information
> that's thrown our way.
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.