Building on Adrian's question, I'd be interested to learn more about why the WG considers 1 implementation as a reasonable threshold. I.e. as opposed to something like 2 or more, demonstrated interop/compliance, or something along those lines.
Personally, I think the implementation requirement is a good idea in principle. But the threshold doesn't seem to be adequate if the goal is an interoperable specification. A document with only 1 implementation is more akin to technical documentation rather than an interoperable specification. But maybe there is a rationale that I'm failing to consider..? Thanks, -Benson On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > It's really hard to enter this discussion with any context. > > Could you post the minutes from the meeting and maybe summarise the points > in > favour of this approach? > (Of course, I can listen to the audio when I have some spare time.) > > Thanks, > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
