I think this may be a useful "procedural bar" and if so then I'd like to see it implemented in other WGs, too... And, to some extent, it may be within the prerogative of the WG chairs. But I am also surprised by the lack of discussion. And I don't see any substantial conversation documented in the proceedings of the last meeting. I'd like to understand why this threshold makes sense to the WG, assuming it does... -Benson
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > Without wanting to be pedantic, I would have expected to see discusison of > this on the list, and determination that the list agreed with it. > Discussion at the meeting is informative, but is not the basis for a WG > decision. > > I am also slightly concerned that the working group is creating a > procedural bar (one that does seem reasonable to me) without buyin from the > larger community. > > Yours, > Joel > > On 11/24/15 6:16 PM, Martin Vigoureux wrote: > >> Hi Adrian, >> >> indeed, minutes should have been available sooner. situation has been >> corrected. >> >> The basic motivation for this is simply to avoid (over)loading the iesg >> with documents that have no (and could possibly never have an) >> implementation. Or, at least, if every spec gets implemented, it is to >> prioritize them. >> >> The discussion happened at the beginning of the meeting. It was on one >> of the slides I have presented as part of the WG status. >> >> -m >> >> Le 24/11/2015 17:07, Adrian Farrel a écrit : >> >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> It's really hard to enter this discussion with any context. >>> >>> Could you post the minutes from the meeting and maybe summarise the >>> points in >>> favour of this approach? >>> (Of course, I can listen to the audio when I have some spare time.) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Adrian >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BESS mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
