On Jan 25, 2008 6:32 PM, Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This problem is always with us when there are incompatible changes. I'm just > saying that if 1!:45 could be quietly supported, the problem would disappear, > and wouldn't that be nice?
1!:45 works for you in j602?? it works for me it J601 but fails in J602. Whether i get a domain error on boxing the arguments seems to depend on the number of arguments with 1 or fewer demanding an unboxed argument. Altogether this demands a memorization of the form of each foreign. ~greg krsnadas.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
