There is some chance profilex will be resurrected and Chris and I will be
discusing this. I suggest relaxing and waiting to see what happens in the
next beta release.

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote:

> In earlier systems, I did hack profile.ijs to load my personal
> profile (not adding anything to profile.ijs other than the link).
> This was a pain because moving from j501b to j502a then j503bbeta,
> j503cbeta, j503ebeta, finally to j503a, then j504 then j601 and so
> forth required that I look at and modify profile.ijs each time...
>
> I was very happy when j602 introduced profilex.ijs and I could stop
> having the tedium of analyzing then hacking the system profile.ijs.
> Now it seems like my happiness only lasted one release.... (unless
> there is an official way to set paths for things like j701-user).
>
> I too am for minimizing complexity, but loosing profilex.ijs seems
> like a step in the wrong direction for that goal...
>
>
> At 12:15  +1200 2010/06/10, Sherlock, Ric wrote:
> >  > From: Joey K Tuttle
> >>  Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2010 07:15
> >>
> >>  On the negative side, jconsole doesn't work (the way I want it to)
> >>  out of the box. My problem has to do with profile.ijs -
> >>
> >>  The previous mechanism of profilex.ijs as derived from
> >>  profilex_template.ijs seems to have been abandoned. This has two
> >>  damaging effects on my normal setup in OSX - one is the ability to
> >>  have the Jxxx-user directory located in Documents rather than at my
> >>  user root (I like to avoid clutter!)
> >>
> >>  The other is bringing in my ancient profile - the profile.ijs seems
> >>  to be saying that startup.ijs is the tool, and I guess that was
> >>  available before along with profilex.ijs, but I never used it. This
> >>  is an issue in both OSX and Linux.
> >>
> >>  I don't mind adapting, but hope that things will stabilize so that
> >>  updating j doesn't cause the environment to break... By the way, my
> >>  old profile.ijs stuff is also missing, of course, in the browser
> >>  session and the j701-user directory is plopped into user root.... I
> >>  think that the move in j602 to avoid the need for hacking profile.ijs
> >>  was a good one - is there a reason for abandoning profilex.ijs ??
> >>
> >>  What is the recommended way to get the previous behaviors in jconsole?
> >
> >With regards profile.ijs, profilex_template.ijs, profilex.ijs:
> >I think the thinking behind the removal of profilex.ijs goes
> >something like this:
> >
> >Because j701 will use JAL to do much more of its updating than in
> >previous versions, users won't be reinstalling their J installations
> >as much and therefore it is not so important to have a mechanism for
> >retaining system folder configurations between installs. It is
> >therefore possible to removing the complexity of profilex.ijs with
> >little impact. If you want to customize the location of your system
> >folders you would now do so directly in profile.ijs.
> >
> >I've reserved judgement for the time being - I'm all for reduced
> >complexity, but I liked the robustness that profilex.ijs provided.
> >
> >With regards to where to put your other "starting configuration
> >stuff", I think that you are correct that the intention is for you
> >not to put anything in profile(x).ijs that isn't to do with setting
> >paths to system folders. As you surmise "other stuff" should be in
> >~config/startup.ijs.
> >
> >For j602 jconsole loaded the startup file
> >"~config/startup_console.ijs" if it was present, while jwd loaded
> >"~config/startup.ijs". In the current j701 beta I think that all
> >front ends are presently loading ~config/startup.ijs
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to