Michael Herger;168455 Wrote: > > Changes for SlimServer 7.0 seem mostly aimed at stability. From what > I > > can see, there are few changes planned that end user will notice. > > That's the awkward thing about stability (performance, ease of use, > etc): > users only notice when it's lacking. You might come back in a few > months > and say "thanks for improving stability, performance and lowering > memory > consumption". That would be nice. > > Probably you're right: the end user is interested in bling-bling, new > > features, nifty interfaces.
It's a simple observation. Certainly, no one would complain about stability enhancements; indeed it would certainly be a much welcomed development. But I don't think it's unfair to say that end users are looking for major upgrades in the interface. The user interface is ancient and hasn't seen any major developments in the several years that I've been using it. If six or eight months from now (the typical time fram for releases, even if they're only pushed out by major hardware releases) the only visible changes are a "progress bar" for scans, then users are probably not going to be too keen on upgrading. -- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31431 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
