On May 6, 2007, at 2:05 PM, tamanaco wrote: > Peter, thanks for the quick reply... I will check that new link soon. > The reason for my comment was based on the past history of frequent > beta releases by SD. Even after major releases. Corporate > idiosyncrasies does not equal "conspiracy"... it just means that "new" > rules regarding beta releases "might" be in effect and that it takes > time for those "new" rules to be digested by the "new" joint/combined > company. I also assumed, that after some time for knowledge transfer > and because of the availability of "more" resources that more betas > would be available. I thought that having frequent beta relases was > giving the developers and the SS community constant feedback which > subsequently resulted in more "stable" and frequent releases. But I > could be wrong. For me, the frequency of beta releases was a challange > and believe or not a strange source of joy. Lately, I have not had too > much extra time on my hands to install the betas, but it was nice see > the progress of SD developer in this forum as they added new features > and fixed the bugs on a daily basis. Maybe I'm the only one that > misses > this.
We're still in the 6.5.2 cycle, and a beta version is built every night that many people use. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
