CatBus;428220 Wrote: > Not at all. I'm just stating that tagging compilations is a solved > problem. It's very simple and easy to understand, like 2 + 2. I'm > simply willing to show people that it's 4. There are lots of other > people who understand tagging compilations too--I'd say most people in > this forum do. They've just given up trying to explain it to you.
I KNOW EXACTLY HOW TO TAG COMPS AND MOST OTHER TAGS IN SUCH A WAY AS IT MAKES SC/SLIM HAPPY. THAT WASN'T THE POINT OR ISSUE AT HAND. THE POINT/ISSUE AT HAND WAS THAT IT IS NOT INCORRECT TO TAG THINGS FOR COMPS OR OTHER THINGS IN WAYS THAT MAKE SC UNHAPPY. honestly, what is it about me saying that that gets you and others here so angry? as i said in my first post in this thread, there are two camps, one camp thinks everything should be done to fit SC's POV, and the other camp thinks the way they are should work in SC, ie. SC should be more flexible. why is that such a verbotten sentiment that you have to get all huffy and puffy? CatBus;428220 Wrote: > So if I followed our abbreviated quoted thread correctly, you asked for > help understanding tagging compilations, I offered help, and you called > me some sort of elitist know-it-all for offering to help you fix your > tags. No wonder people have you on their ignore list. you didn't follow it correctly, and i could care less who has me ignored. frankly, i'm probably better off without nattering nabobs of negativity hounding me. you basically, with this post, avoided the main contention of my argument, which i just restated. YES, everyone COULD rearrange their schemes, SOP, and/or whatever to fit SC's rules, and they could invest the time to learn them, and vest the time to retag to fit them, and on and on... but i contend THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE TO. SC should be better out of the box for COMMON marketplace scenarios. CatBus;428220 Wrote: > I have a great idea...let's use our differing solutions to atrocity's > compilation problem to decide who should be listening to whom when it > comes to understanding how compilations work. Our answers are quoted > below: > > This is like shooting fish in a barrel... actually, even phil seems to think i'm likely right, esp since atrocity has now said he didn't do the full clear and rescan which means if he changed comp=1 albums to comp=0 IT DIDN"T TAKE EFFECT, ie. BUG. but you go on with your bad self. however, my comment was AFTER yours to atrocity, and only meant to be in addition to, it was not in anyway contradictory or intended to be. frankly, i don't think you followed that convo properly at all. -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - w/sc 7.3.3b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57922 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
