>I'm still not personally convinced it makes sense to have the link to
>compilations in "Artists" menu but I can personally live with it if most
>people wants it, I just won't be using it personally because my feeling
>is that everything in the "Artists" menu should be something that exists
>in the real world and "Various Artists" is just a way to indicate that
>the album is a compilation not something that exists in real life. If I
>want to access compilations I would use the main "Comps" menu or the
>"Album Artists/Comps" menu. It would probably be called "Various
>Artists" and not "Comps", but you get the picture.

Remember that some people wish to never have compilation albums (no explicit 
tags, no auto compilation detection).  They would explicitly tag (or retrieve 
from a metadata source), such that there was an Album Artist = Various Artists 
and no compilation tag.  To LMS scanner, this is just a regular album with an 
album artist denoting the main artist for the album.  Why shouldn't Various 
Artists exist in the list in this case, it is just the name of an artist.

In fact Artists > Various Artists could have a mixture of regular or 
compilation albums by the artist Various Artists.

It should not be treated differently from any other artist name.  Although the 
name can be used by the scanner to denote an album when it is detected as a 
compilation, browsing albums shouldn't care about this logic.
_______________________________________________
beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta

Reply via email to