On Feb 2, 4:04 pm, Bruce Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 11:57 pm, Luis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Checks whether the underlying page is happy?
> Yes, obviously. That's why I suggested a delay. They delay could even
> be configurable based on how long the site had been down, and the
> pages could have fallback.
>
> > Part of the upgrades they're working on are to
> > address bandwith concerns.
>
> Really? I'd be thrilled to know how their database reorg will help
> with that.
>
It's not just a database re-org.
Lots of small changes. Things like the geeklists had changes done
specifically to address bandwidth concerns.
>
> There's a middle ground and I outlined how it could provide useful
> functionality without being susceptible to impatient people reloading
> or clicking on links. Given how often people are reloading the page /
> now/ I'd suspect any auto-status updated that was trusted by the bulk
> of users would very likely provide a net win.
>
>
And in the end, they'd have a better BGG down page. Seems very low
priority considering they're also currently working on minimizing down
time in the first place.
If they're taking enhancement suggestions I'd rather see things like
the XML API get worked on.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG
Down" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/BGG_down?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
