Totally Agree! +1 ... I don't need a bunch of new features...I think it was better two or three years ago...the old K.I.S.S adage has never failed me.
On Mar 15, 7:55 pm, Alexonfyre <[email protected]> wrote: > I know I might be in the minority, but I like bgg because it reliably > has all the information I need, and resources to improve my gaming > sessions. I really don't need a bunch of new features and a facelift, > particularly if I am unable to use some of the resources I need > because of all the down time it causes. I'm afraid BGG might be > getting facebook syndrome. The really bad news is, it's > degenerative... > > On Mar 15, 8:42 pm, Timothy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mar 14, 11:31 pm, dougadamsau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That's what development servers are for. You install when tested. > > > Yes. And I'm sure they do. However, no matter how you cut it, you > > can never make a test/dev environment exactly like production, because > > you can never test performance in the same way. Not just that, but > > rolling back, when you have major database changes can be difficult, > > if not impossible to do, once you've brought the system live again, or > > you lose the new data that's been added. (And believe me, people > > would complain even more if data went missing). > > > To suggest that Scott and his team are not doing everything they can > > to keep the production environment up and stable is quite > > disappointing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
