Hi, Alex,

On Oct 26, 2008, at 15:51 , Alex Hamann wrote:
>> 2) Next, a preview glitch: I have 537 entries in my .bib file.  If I
>> select them all, a preview is generated in the "integrated" preview
>> window, without fuss.  However, if I have the floating preview window
>> open, it shows a TeX error (the integrated window still makes no
>> complaint).  The TeX log shows no errors (a bunch of TeX warnings
>> about under/overfill, and bibtex warnings about missing fields, but  
>> no
>> errors).  I tried a binary search to see where the problem might be,
>> but the results were a bit perplexing.
>>
>> If I isolate 463 of the 537 items in a static group, I always get the
>> error.  Depending on the selections making up the group, the error
>> goes away after deselecting some small number of items (1, 2, 3, ..).
>>
>> I hope that's clear; it seems pretty weird to me.
>
> What I did today in order to track down items which contain a TeX
> error (which seems to be your problem as well) in a bib file with >  
> 700
> items was to switch the bottom frame of the main window to TeX  
> preview.
> Then I selected a number of items at the same time and tried to track
> down which items cause the errors. It is a pain in the neck to have
> to do that for large bib files but there is probably little one can
> do (besides maybe selecting all items in the main window, then  
> pressing
> the TeX preview-icon and switch to the Log report to see where  
> problems
> occur - but on my old and slow iBook that is even slower than the  
> other
> approach).

The way I got to the above was essentially a binary search.  This got  
me the "463" number, which so far seems magic for this problem.

Note that the "TeX error" does *not* show up on the "integrated"  
preview panel, only on the external (SHFT-CMD-T) panel.  As Adam  
suggested, this may be related to the task stuff (in an earlier  
problem I was seeing with previews, the behavior was different between  
the two, which (I assume) made Adam think of this issue).

AFAICT, this problem is not a TeX "processing" problem; perhaps a TeX  
"operation" problem, or an interaction between TeX and BibDesk.

Justin

--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
--------
If you're not confused,
You're not paying attention
--------




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to