On Oct 26, 2008, at 17:02 , Christiaan Hofman wrote: > On 27 Oct 2008, at 12:54 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> On Oct 26, 2008, at 16:25 , Christiaan Hofman wrote: [snip] >>> Confirms that it's probably just a few items incompatible with TeX. >> >> Not really, but only because my description of the problem lacked a >> few details (sorry about that; I edited too many times before >> sending). >> >> Specifically, it seems that the "463 out of 531" number is important. >> Again, though I have not done an exhaustive study, it appears that >> 463 >> is the smallest number of entries from this .bib that causes the >> problem, and additionally, *none* of the entries which seem to be >> critical (as I described in an earlier reply) show this problem. >> >> To restate, if I just select those entries, in the groups in >> question, >> whose presence seems to be needed to cause the error, I get no error.
> The only difference between the two is the RTF preview that's > generated for the separate window, but not for the preview pane. So > it's probably a problem with latex2rtf. Wait. What? How did RTF get into this? In "View->Bottom Preview", I have TeX selected, and no default template (according to the menu). What am I missing? The "separate window" invoked by SHFT-CMD-T is also TeX, no? At least that's what the Window menu calls it. Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds -------- If you're not confused, You're not paying attention -------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
