On 26 Oct 2008, at 10:35 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:

>
> On Oct 25, 2008, at 14:24 , Adam M. Goldstein wrote:
>
>> I wonder how the nightlies are working out for people. If the major
>> outstanding issues have been resolved---for instance, Adam mentioned
>> that there were some issues with the Tiger nightlies---then let's
>> start voting on whether it's time for a new release.
>
> Thanks to Alex, I'm now testing something more up-to-date :-}.  All
> seems well, but still a couple of minor things.  The second is kind of
> gnarly, FWIW.
>
> 1) This is probably an Apple issue, but if anyone can provide
> clarification it will help in the bug report: On 10.5.5, I have
> BibDesk assigned to one Space.  If I have the separate preview window
> (SHFT-CMD-T) open, and switch Spaces, and then try to switch back to
> BibDesk (CMD-TAB or the Dock), the preview window shows up in the
> current Space.  Closing that window lets me switch to BibDesk with  
> CMD-
> TAB/Dock.
>
> So: should the preview window stay in BibDesk's assigned Space, and if
> so, is this under BibDesk's control?
>

I've often had problems with spaces, even more serious ones like a  
sheet being associated to a space different  from the window it's  
attached to. So lots of child diseases. Generally, almost nothing  
about spaces is made public by Apple, so individual apps have  
virtually no control about how this behaves. Certainly, BD does not  
modify any default behavior, in particular the tex preview window has  
the standard behavior (whatever that is). So this sounds like an Apple  
bug.

> 2) Next, a preview glitch: I have 537 entries in my .bib file.  If I
> select them all, a preview is generated in the "integrated" preview
> window, without fuss.

What do you mean by the integrated window? If you're just talking  
about templated text preview, that's completely unrelated, as it has  
absolutely nothing to do with TeX.

> However, if I have the floating preview window
> open, it shows a TeX error (the integrated window still makes no
> complaint).

> The TeX log shows no errors (a bunch of TeX warnings
> about under/overfill, and bibtex warnings about missing fields, but no
> errors).  I tried a binary search to see where the problem might be,
> but the results were a bit perplexing.
>

It must be a TeX error, and that's not under BD's control. I guess  
there's some item that breaks TeX.

> If I isolate 463 of the 537 items in a static group, I always get the
> error.  Depending on the selections making up the group, the error
> goes away after deselecting some small number of items (1, 2, 3, ..).
>

Confirms that it's probably just a few items incompatible with TeX.

Christiaan

> I hope that's clear; it seems pretty weird to me.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Of course, I could still be asleep, and just not know it.
>
> Justin
>
> --
> Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
> Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
> -----------
> My wife 'n kids 'n dogs are gone,
> I can't get Jesus on the phone,
> But Ol' Milwaukee's Best is my best friend.
> -----------
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's  
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win  
> great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in  
> the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to