I am not so sure "private property" is exempt from 346.54(1)e

(e) For the purpose of parking, mopeds and electric personal
assistive mobility devices shall be considered bicycles. Where
possible without impeding the flow of pedestrian traffic, a bicycle,
moped, or electric personal assistive mobility device may be
parked on a sidewalk. A bicycle, moped, or electric personal
assistive mobility device may be parked in a bike rack or other
similar area designated for bicycle parking.

About two years ago I pointed out that there is a difference between
parking in a bike rack, and parking adjacent to (thus unlawfully
blocking pedestrian access to) a bike rack.  Perhaps this logic is what
applies?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dar Ward
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:48 AM
To: Tim Wong; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] UW West Campus biking

Essentially, the UW is "private property" and we can set our own parking
rules.  The City is a different matter.  It is my understanding that the
City is working to remedy the issue...but it involves extensive
signage.  That's all I know about it.
-Dar

 

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to