Re: [Biojava-l] yes, something like this

[Matthew Pocock]

Agreed - biojava and UML don't like each other. UML seems much more 
suited to data-blob designs where as biojava is mainly a relationships 
and associations design. The OWL for biojava looks ok though. Hey ho.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Unfortunately the heavy use of interfaces and 'mutliple inheritance' in 
biojava means that those UML diagrams are about as simple as you will get. 
I suppose they could be pruned a bit to show only interfaces implemted and 
classes extended and not dependencies and reverse dependencies.

- Mark





Magic Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/19/2004 02:37 PM
       To:     Mark Schreiber/GP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
       cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
       Subject:        [Biojava-l] yes, something like this
this one seems too detail and complex, i mean just class function and 
inherit relationship.
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l



_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
 

_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l