On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Matthew Pocock wrote: > The OWL for biojava looks ok though. Hey ho.
Is this a tease? :) What would/could one do with an OWL representation of the biojava object model? michael _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
