Re: [Biojava-l] yes, something like this

[Magic Fang]

Michael Heuer wrote:

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Matthew Pocock wrote:

 

The OWL for biojava looks ok though. Hey ho.
   

Is this a tease? :)  What would/could one do with an OWL representation of
the biojava object model?
  michael



 

Does the OWL means the Open Wrokflow/Lifecycle model?  I would refer it 
to owl, that few would see it or I am confused on biojava architecture:-)
It is more complex than bioperl.
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l