"Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They're definitions mostly as opposed to just declarations. I imagine
> that's why it's called %defines and --defines. So, I decided %pre-defines
> and %post-defines makes more sense.
This all sounds OK (in that I can't simplify it much more :-) except
that the names are still confusing. "%pre-defines" sounds like
predefined symbols, but then "%post-defines" would be -- what --
postdefined symbols?
How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
depending on context? That would match %{...%}'s behavior.
