Good morning Luke,

> (Maybe it should be the first output
> instead of the last... Is there any legitimate reason one would have multiple
> such dummy outputs?)

None, but how about use of `SIGHASH_SINGLE` flag? If a dummy output is added as 
the first, would it not require adjustment of the inputs of the transaction?

In context you are discussing the transaction serialization, though, so perhaps 
`SIGHASH_SINGLE`, is unaffected?


bitcoin-dev mailing list

Reply via email to