Good morning Luke, > (Maybe it should be the first output > > instead of the last... Is there any legitimate reason one would have multiple > > such dummy outputs?)
None, but how about use of `SIGHASH_SINGLE` flag? If a dummy output is added as the first, would it not require adjustment of the inputs of the transaction? In context you are discussing the transaction serialization, though, so perhaps `SIGHASH_SINGLE`, is unaffected? Regards, ZmnSCPxj _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
