Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev
> <> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'd like to pick up the discussion from a few months ago, and propose a new
>> sighash flag, `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`, that removes the commitment to the previous
> I know it seems kind of silly, but I think it's somewhat important
> that the formal name of this flag is something like
> "SIGHASH_REPLAY_VULNERABLE" or likewise or at least

I agree with the DO_NOT_WANT-style naming.  REUSE_VULNERABLE seems to
capture it: the word VULNERABLE should scare people away (or at least
cause them to google further).

bitcoin-dev mailing list

Reply via email to