On Jan 14, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Brooks Hassig <[email protected]> wrote:
> For me, anything I can access via Quicksilver should be manipulatable. What I > love about QS is that it tries to remove layer between me and what I would > like to do. So why add a layer of complexity here? Well, the action did work. The abbreviation you assigned would help quickly locate that item, but only if it exists in the context where you’re searching. I said it wasn’t obvious, but it definitely makes sense. What’s the alternative? -- Rob McBroom <http://www.skurfer.com/> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en.
