Randy McMurchy wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 07:14 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > >> Yes, hal could become sticky. This is one package that is making real >> demands on the kernel and udev. hal-0.5.4 doesn't indicate it needs >> anything higher than 2.6.11, which is needed for hal-0.5.1. Don't >> know if those are new enough for gnome-2.14, not familiar with KDE. > > I've looked at gnome-volume-manager (2.14.0) and it requires > HAL >= 0.5.4. I've not looked at others yet. I've decided to postpone > GNOME update until 2.14.1 is released (8 days from now) so I've been > doing other things. I will start in on GNOME in a couple of days. > > Anyway, we may have to stick with current HAL/D-Bus, I suppose I need > to put a remark in the KDE bug to disregard the updates, and instead > to please annotate what versions configure looks for in various KDE > packages that utilize HAL/D-Bus.
It really sounds like we need to gently encourage a new LFS release with the udev update. LFS 6.1.1 is getting long-in-the-tooth. The kernel is now at 2.6.16.1 and there is a 2.6.17-rc1 available. The real stumbling block from what I can tell is the headers issue. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
