On 1/21/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > > > > I suppose I don't understand what you are trying to propose > > for the PDF links (or why they must be different than the HTML). > > I just downloaded the 6.1 version of the pdf. In page 52 (54th physical > page): > > "Refer to ../../../../lfs/view/stable/chapter07/bootscripts.html for > more information on the LFS-Bootscripts package."
When we go to final release, shouldn't we convert to absolute links anyway? Pointing to the current stable is not necessarily a good idea. For instance, the 6.1 version of the book should point to LFS-6.1, not LFS stable, which is 6.2. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
