Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/21/07 12:49 CST: > Answering my own question: No. As we release -rc?, we don't want to > have to populate quantum and anduin with duplicate trees. We should > leave these as svn until final and then change them/populate the servers.
Not necessarily. Wouldn't it be easier to simply rename the directories on Quantum and Anduin as the version names change? There would be no need to keep an rc1 or beta1 or whatever version directory once the final release is done. At least that would be one way to do it. I suppose there is benefit and drawback no matter which way we do it. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:52:00 up 11 days, 13:06, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.15, 0.25 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
