Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/21/07 12:30 CST: > When we go to final release, shouldn't we convert to absolute links > anyway? Pointing to the current stable is not necessarily a good idea. > For instance, the 6.1 version of the book should point to LFS-6.1, not > LFS stable, which is 6.2.
Absolutely. In fact, it should be changed right now. There is nothing to be gained by leaving it as it is now, even in the development version. Going forward, as soon as BLFS dev targets a stable version of LFS, the entity should be changed to the version number, not stable. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:36:00 up 11 days, 12:50, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.15, 0.45 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
