Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/21/07 12:49 CST: > >> Answering my own question: No. As we release -rc?, we don't want to >> have to populate quantum and anduin with duplicate trees. We should >> leave these as svn until final and then change them/populate the servers. > > Not necessarily. Wouldn't it be easier to simply rename the directories > on Quantum and Anduin as the version names change? > > There would be no need to keep an rc1 or beta1 or whatever version > directory once the final release is done. At least that would be one > way to do it. I suppose there is benefit and drawback no matter which > way we do it.
At those times when we have more than one book going (e.g. -rc1 and svn) renaming wouldn't work. A link might work, but then if something gets updated in svn, it would get updated in -rc1 too which may are may not be the right thing. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
