On 09/12/11 04:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> On 08/12/11 15:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >>> I don't have a problem with adding Gnome 3, but would like it in a >>> completely separate section. We would not want to mix Gnome2 and Gnome3 >>> packages. I agree with Andy that the pages should be marked. It's easy >>> enough to define an entity in general.ent and just place it in each page >>> like we do &lfs70_checked; >>> >>> At some point when Gnome3 is stable and everyone agrees, we could then >>> just drop Gnome2 from the book. >>> >>> -- Bruce >> >> That is a lot of work having two versions of Gnome in the same book. >> There are a lot of duplicated packages (ids) that need to be separated >> out, and I'm not just talking about the packages within the Gnome >> sections. e.g gvfs, libunique,... and then there are all the other refs. >> I'm prepared to drop the pages in as is replacing gnome2, and I can >> probably start this weekend, but having a separated version would >> require applying new unique ids and index refs to all the existing pages. > > I see your point. I'm not generally a Gnome user, so it doesn't really > affect me. I'd say that you should use your judgment about how much it > will affect other users and drop it in when you think it's ready. > > -- Bruce > >
I don't know if I'll have time before the new year to do any serious work. I've been rebuilding my wife's/kids pc to the latest and greatest, and have come aross a stumbling block with Cheese. There seems to be a few bugs with this latest version. Namely video above 640x480 is corrupted and the effects don't work. In the meantime, I have upload my BLFS version to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~wblaszcz/MyBLFS.tar.bz2 . Feel free to use whatever usefull information there is. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
