> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:27:23 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]>
> To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] lxpanel-0.8.0 has a new package requirement
>
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:35:56AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >>> On 08-12-2014 18:17, Christopher Gregory wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I successfully got the gtk+2 version to work with lxpanel-0.8.0.  I am
> >>>> using lxde at the moment.
> >>>
> >>> I think we need to add only this one.
> >>>
> >>   O/T - I'm not seeing any of Christopher's posts recently.  Whenever
> >> I go into gmail, I usually find them in the spam (for some reason,
> >> gmail does not like his posts), but on this separate account nothing.
> >> I know that ntlworld mail is outsourced to google, I guess they are
> >> applying similar filtering but without any way for those of us using
> >> pop3 to get what they think is spam.
> >
> > I went to my Google spam filter and also found 20 messages from
> > Christopher there.  I moved them back to my inbox and then I retrieved
> > them via POP.
> >
> > I don't know why Google thought they were spam unless there is a lot of
> > spam origination from his ISP.
> >
> > Hopefully Google can learn from me restoring the messages.
> >
> > I'll note that I get a huge amount of spam from the mailing lists that
> > others don't see.  Of these Google does filter many and that is helpful.
>
> A little searching and I found:
>
> http://email.about.com/od/gmailtips/qt/et_whitelist.htm
>
> Gmail users may find this helpful.
>


 - hmmm, so long as gmail isn't naive about spoofed from/&c addresses
(and likewise for other parameters of the messages); I'd expect them to
not be; but would be interesting to know in practice on at least that
point - I know that their spam-filtering is generally well-regarded.


akh



>    -- Bruce
>
>


--
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to