On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:29:43AM +0100, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> > You did not mention that people using old ICU (e.g. 60) also had the
> > problem.
> Because I do not agree with that: For me, firefox-63 built just fine without
> patching with either its internal icu (ISTR despite system icu-63) or with
> system icu-62. The problem arose from system icu-63 starting to export (no
> idea whether on purpose) its "checkImpl" AND firefox including that.
I did not intend to describe either 62 or 61 as 'old ICU' in that
line. When the issue was first raised, I built ff-63.0 with system
icu of both those versions without problems.
But I had previously failed to build on 60 with the same problem.
>
> > Anyway, with 63.0.1 on BLFS-8.2 (ICU 60) that sed works. It also
> > works on this-week's 64 beta on an 8.3 / 62 system where it is not
> > needed, so I think we should just pick it up.
> That was my intention: Without having to understand what either developers
> intend to do with their "checkImpl", I can avoid the name clash without side
> effects by renaming the Firefox internal one to e.g. "checkFFImpl".
>
> > I'm now getting ready to build a fresh system (my first with ICU
> > 63). Will see how it goes,
> Good luck.
>
Thanks.
ken
--
Is it about a bicycle ?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
