On Fri, 9 Nov 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:

You did not mention that people using old ICU (e.g. 60) also had the
problem.
Because I do not agree with that: For me, firefox-63 built just fine without patching with either its internal icu (ISTR despite system icu-63) or with system icu-62. The problem arose from system icu-63 starting to export (no idea whether on purpose) its "checkImpl" AND firefox including that.

Anyway, with 63.0.1 on BLFS-8.2 (ICU 60) that sed works.  It also
works on this-week's 64 beta on an 8.3 / 62 system where it is not
needed, so I think we should just pick it up.
That was my intention: Without having to understand what either developers intend to do with their "checkImpl", I can avoid the name clash without side effects by renaming the Firefox internal one to e.g. "checkFFImpl".

I'm now getting ready to build a fresh system (my first with ICU
63). Will see how it goes,
Good luck.

Uwe
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to