On Monday 17 June 2013 07:56:35 NP wrote: > > Right. With Perl-5.18, pod2man has decided to enforce more strict syntax > rules. This breaks some packages in BLFS, for instance : > - openssl-1.01e > - wget-1.14 > - Wireshark-1.8.3 > > Mainly, pod2man rejects =ITEM commands followd by a number. To fix it, > just prefix the number with some alpha character. > > The =ITEM commands should also been strictly enclosed by =OPEN / =BREAK > commands (one occurrence in openssl package). > > I have made a patch for openssl; perhaps you my find it useful. > It works thanks -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
- [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont install libs binaries lux-integ
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont install libs binar... Bruce Dubbs
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont install libs b... Ken Moffat
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont install li... NP
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont instal... lux-integ
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont instal... Ken Moffat
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont instal... Ken Moffat
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont i... Martin Ward
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wo... Ken Moffat
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont i... Bruce Dubbs
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wo... Ken Moffat
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1... Ken Moffat
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont i... NP
- Re: [blfs-support] openssl-1.0.1e wont install libs b... Ken Moffat
