On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:22:29AM +0100, Martin Ward wrote: > Hi > > I had the same thing recently and constructed the attached patch > based on the fedora , be interesting to see if there is any > difference. > > > Regards > > Martin
Thanks! We have the following differences : 1. I've managed to include spurious .orig and .rej files for both SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list and SSL_CTX_use_psk_identity_hint : that makes the patch a *lot* bigger than it needs to be. 2. for SSL_shutdown I show the return values as 1,0,<0, you show them as 1,0,-1 : I've already queried this page in my earlier mail (the "1, text 2. text 3. -1 text" organization) : I'm not sure about the 1 or 0, but your -1 is more accurate than my <0. Subject to any further comments, I prefer your version. I guess it should be credited to you, based on fedora. (Sorry, Nico). ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
