David Abrahams wrote:
Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I still prefer the tabularized function descriptions, FWIW. I vote
for Tabularized. The definition list looks a bit cluttered. It looks
cluttered especially when there is just one parameter.
It's cluttered because of the lack of vertical association between
terms and definitions.
http://boost-consulting.com/mplbook/metafunctions.html#details handles
this much better.
I see. Those are good DLs indeed. Do you have something for
parameter lists?
Cheers,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
