Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>I still prefer the tabularized function descriptions, FWIW. I vote >>>for Tabularized. The definition list looks a bit cluttered. It looks >>> cluttered especially when there is just one parameter. >> It's cluttered because of the lack of vertical association between >> terms and definitions. >> http://boost-consulting.com/mplbook/metafunctions.html#details handles >> this much better. > > I see. Those are good DLs indeed. Do you have something for > parameter lists?
Nothing specifically for parameter lists, no. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
